NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION SEMINAR (INTENSIVE)
Professor C. Menkel-Meadow Fall 2003
Fellows Elizabeth Davidson and Sara Thacker
Negotiation and Mediation Seminar -LAWJ-317-08 (Intensive)
Office 404
Ph. 202-662-9379
fax 202-662-9412
email: meadow@law.georgetown
Office hours: Alternate Monday afternoons 3-4
Course Outline and Requirements
This course is a basic introduction to the theoretical, practical, skills and
policy issues in negotiation and mediation as forms of dispute resolution and
transaction planning. It will be conducted this semester as an intensive course,
meeting every day for two week-ends. Attendance for all class sessions is
mandatory. Failure to attend a class or a portion of a class will result in no
credit for the course. The class will meet the following dates and times:
Sept. 5 5:45 pm-6:30 pm Course Introduction and requirements Sept. 12 9:00 am-4:30 pm Room 437 Sept. 13 9:00 am-4:30 pm Sept. 14 9:30 am-5:30 pm Oct. 10 9:30 am-5:00 pm Oct. 11 9:30 am-5:15 pm Oct. 12 9:00 am-4:45 pm
Your final paper will be due the last day of exams.
This course is designed to expose you to the various conceptual frameworks for
thinking about negotiation and how to practice various forms of negotiation (and
ultimately, facilitated negotiation, which is mediation). In this course you
will be exposed to cognitive and conceptual models of negotiation (including
game theory, theories of conflict and difference, theories of bargaining,
argument and principle, problem solving), as well as to behavioral forms of
learning (experiential role-plays, different strategies and tactics, information
searches and planning, question framing, agreement drafting). There will be an
opportunity for video-taped performance and critique.
You will be taught to analyze your own and other classmates’ performances as
negotiators and mediators and to learn how to sensitively and acutely analyze
your own conceptualization and behavior of the negotiation process, both for the
course and for later professional and life skills development.
You will be required to read, write and perform. Given the intensive nature of
this course you will have to do all of these things simultaneously and to apply
what you are learning right away. You will learn that negotiation is a dynamic
and interactive process so that things will change as you are working and you
will be dependent on others with whom you are participating. You will be called
on to act in many different roles, including as lawyers, clients, observers and
critics of yourselves and others. This course will teach you how to act, as well
as, think like a lawyer.
We will question all of your assumptions about what it is that lawyers do when
they negotiate, including assumptions about scarce resources and fixed pies and
desires to “beat the other side.” This course contrasts an
adversarial-competitive model of negotiation with the more modern notion of
negotiation as an opportunity to solve legal, social, economic and other forms
of problems and to do so creatively and with Pareto-optimal solutions. You will
be taught to think of negotiation as an opportunity to make troublesome
situations better than they might otherwise be without your intervention.
During the first week-end we will concentrate on the basic models of negotiation
and apply them to litigation problems. In the second week-end we will look at
negotiation in the transactional context and begin an introduction to the
mediation (facilitated negotiation) process. As we proceed through the
applications of negotiation theory to particular problem areas we will also look
at some policy and ethical issues including ethics and truth telling in
negotiation, communication and representation issues with clients, appropriate
uses of different models of dispute resolution, the role of gender, class, race
and personality in negotiation behaviors and the institutionalization of some
forms of dispute resolution in the legal system (such as in court-mandated forms
of “alternative dispute resolution”). You will also explore collaborative skills
and learn how to work with others (both “clients” and other lawyers when you
work in teams on some problems).
Course Requirements
1. Attendance is mandatory for all sessions. Do not plan anything else
for your professional or personal life for the two week-ends of the course. You
will be busy during the day with class and will have reading and writing to do
at night between sessions.
2. There will be brief writing assignments during both week-ends and a longer journal assignment and reading to do between sessions. The final paper will be due the last day of exams and will require you to apply what you have learned about negotiation and mediation to develop an analysis of either a problem you have worked on or another one in the real world. This is not a research paper, but is a “thought” paper instead, requiring you to apply the concepts learned in the course.
3. There are readings assigned from four mandatory and one optional sources:
The books are available in the bookstore. I will distribute other articles
either in class or through the Distribution Center.
4. This is a graded course. You will be graded on class participation,
negotiation simulations, journal and short papers and the final paper
(approximately 15 pages). We will not grade you on particular outcomes of
negotiation (to encourage you to experiment with new behaviors and more creative
and interesting ideas for resolutions), but you will be graded on preparation
and commitment to the materials and exercises.
5. This course depends on confidentiality. Do not reveal any facts, information,
outcomes or special instructions about a problem until you are told you may.
This is to create both a safe place for mutual exploration of new and difficult
behaviors and also to ensure that everyone has the same and appropriate amount
of information for each assignment.
6. You will be required to conduct part of one negotiation on video-tape for
feedback from the instructors. Some of this will be during class sessions, but
for some of you it may involve some time outside of the two week-end sessions.
Course Schedule
(Note that times and topics are approximate– we may spend more or less time on
certain items as the class proceeds).
| Date & Time | Topic & Reading Assignment | Exercise |
| September 5 5:45-6:30 |
Course Introduction, Overview
and Requirements Getting to Yes, xvii-pg 14 (Intro & Ch. 1) Mnookin, Introduction p. 1-10 For first week-end, read all of Getting to Yes; Menkel-Meadow, Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation (available in Distribution Center); Raiffa pp. 7-19; 33-77; Mnookin pp. 1-126; 224-248 You also should review Rules 1.2, 3.3, 4.1 and 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. |
|
| September 12
(Friday) 9:00 am-10:00 10:00-10:45 10:45-11:00 11:00-12:30 12:30-2:00 2:00-3:00 3:00-3:45 3:45-4:00 4:00-4:30 |
Introduction to Negotiation Models of Negotiation I- Distributive and Competitive Break Models of Negotiation II- Integrative and Principled Lunch and Preparation for Walker Problem-Solving: Negotiate Walker and de-brief Models of Negotiation III- Mixed Models Creating and Claiming Value PD theory and games Break Negotiate Burgers Assignment for Rapid handed out |
Swansong Bedding/Swealy Walker Devens/Cunningham |
|
September 13 (Saturday) 9:00-10:00 10:00-10:45 10:45-11:00 11:00-11:30 11:30-12:30 12:30-1:45 1:45-2:30 2:30-3:15 3:15-3:30 3:30-4:30 |
Negotiate Rapid–Mixed Models Debrief Rapid–Models of Negotiation IV Problem Solving Break Stages and Phases of Negotiation Role of Law in Negotiation Lunch and preliminary preparation of Planning and Preparation for Negotiation Dispute Resolution (litigation) Risk assessment; legal predictions Client Interviewing and Counseling Break Creativity and Problem Solving in Negotiation |
Rapid v. Scott Bright/Gold Klare Litigation Problem Negotiation Plan (Meet w/clients) Problems and IDEO |
|
September 14 (Sunday) 9:30-10:30 10:30-1:00 1:00-2:00 2:00-3:00 3:00-3:30 3:30-3:45 3:45-5:00 5:00-5:30 |
Submit: Negotiation Plan
(9:30 am) Strategy and Planning Meetings for Litigation Negotiation With clients and supervisors Negotiate Litigation Problem Lunch Process and Outcome in Negotiation Debrief and assessment Role of Personality in Negotiation Break Ethics in Negotiation Valdez v. Alloway Wrap-up Issues in Litigation (Dispute Resolution) Negotiation and Preparation for Next Sessions |
Taping MODE Confectioners |
|
Journal Assignment and Memo
for intersessions distributed–Due October 9 |
||
|
October 10 (Friday) 9:30-10:00 am 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00 12:00-1:00 1:00-2:00 2:00- 2:45 2:45-3:00 3:00-4:00 4:00-5:00 |
Review of Key Negotiation Concepts Differences in Litigation and Transactional Negotiation Role of Context Role of Information in Negotiation Barriers to Achieving Negotiated Resolutions Lunch Role of Gender and Race in Negotiation Reading: Ayres, Menkel-Meadow, Kolb (Distributed) Break Planning for Transactional Negotiation Prep for Next Day |
Exercises Tapes Vernon/Green |
|
October 11 (Saturday) 9:30-10:30 10:30-10:45 10:45-1:00 1:00-2:00 2:00-3:00 3:00-4:00 4:00-4:15 4:15-5:15 |
Submit Transactional
Negotiation Plan for Vernon/Green Meet with client/supervisors Break Negotiate Vernon/Green Lunch Debrief Vernon/Green Drafting Agreements Break Coalitions and Multi-Party Negotiation Issues |
Vernon/Green Taping Coalition Game |
|
October 12 (Sunday) 9:00-10:00 10:00-10:30 10:30:11:00 11:00-12:30 12:30-1:30 1:30-2:30 2:30-3:30 3:30-3:45 3:45-4:30 4:30-4:45 |
Mediation Introduction to Facilitated Negotiation Contracting for Mediation/Opening Statements -suitability -ground rules -confidentiality Practicum 1- Opening Statements Styles of Mediation & Context Caucuses/Joint Meetings Business/Family Mediations Lunch Issues and Agenda Setting in Mediation Role of Law in Mediation Framing and Re-framing Practicum 2 Dealing with Conflict in Mediation Empathy Training and Communication Practicum 3 Break Option Generation and Agreement in Mediation Course Conclusion-Wrap-Up and Evaluation |
Med/Arb exercise Ed/Jo Tapes-Prosando Scenes from a Mediation Saving the Last Dance Ed/Jo Ed/Jo Ed/Jo |
Final Papers due: Last Day of Exams (no extensions)
For the final paper you will be asked to choose a negotiation or mediation you
participated in this course, or select a completed or on-going negotiation or
mediation in the real world (from news reports, political memoirs, case studies)
and write an analysis, describing the negotiation models that the negotiators
used, their assumptions, their behavioral choices and their results and develop
a critique of what was effective and what was not, making explicit what your
criteria of evaluations are.
Copyright 2004 Carrie Menkel-Meadow. Teachers are free to copy these materials for educational use in their courses only, provided that appropriate acknowledgment of the author is made. For permission to use these materials for any other purpose, contact the author.