CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
W.B. Fisch, Fall 2006
Assignment #32
C. Classifications Based
on Gender
- REED
V. REED, p. 754 (1971)
- what
is the regulation, and what is its purpose?
- selecting qualified estate administrators?
- choosing among equally qualified estate administrators?
- what
standard of review does the Court apply?
- rational basis?
- is
the purpose legitimate?
- is
the classification rationally related to its purpose?
- heightened scrutiny?
- FRONTIERO
V. RICHARDSON, p. 755 (1973)
- what
is the regulation, and what is its purpose?
- against which gender does the regulation allegedly discriminate, and
how?
- what
standard of review does the Court apply?
- rational basis?
- is
the government's purpose legitimate?
- is
the classification rationally related to its purpose?
- heightened scrutiny?
- is
the importance of the purpose questioned?
- is
a closer fit required than would normally be expected under a rational
basis test? If so, how much closer?
- CRAIG
V. BOREN, p. 759 (1976)
- what
regulation, and what is its purpose?
- what
standard of review is applied?
- "strict
scrutiny"?
- if
not, why not?
- which
gender is disadvantaged by the classification? So what?
- is
gender discrimination analogous to race discrimination?
- character of gender identification
- history of discrimination
- likelihood of legitimate reasons for
classifying by gender
- When
is a gender classification actually being used?
- pregnancy
- Geduldig, p. 766: exclusion of disabilities due to
normal pregnancy
- Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, p. 767: denial of seniority credit for
pregnancy leave, as distinguished from disability leave
- use of mortality tables which differentiate by
gender, to determine pension benefits: Manhart
and Norris, p. 767