CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
W.B. Fisch, Fall 2006
Assignment #47
[Chapter
17. RELIGION
AND THE CONSTITUTION
[1. The Establishment
Clause
[B. Government Religious Exercises, Ceremonies, Displays and
Practices]
[2.
Religious Speech and Displays on Public Property
- CAPITOL SQUARE REVIEW AND ADVISORY BD.V. PINETTE, p. 1760
(1995).
- What regulation or action is being challenged,
and what is it purpose?
- What is the basis for the challenge?
- Is the challenged action distinguishable from
that in Lamb's Chapel? If so, is the distinction favorable or
unfavorable to the action?
- Is the challenged action distinguishable from
that in Allegheny
County? If so,
does it help or hurt the Board's case?
- Is it significant that the challenged action
occurred in December 1993, on advice of counsel, less than a year after Lamb's
Chapel was handed down? Could counsel have learned anything from that
case, that would dictate the challenged
decision?
- Why wouldn't it constitute an
"endorsement" of the KKK's religious
views, to allow it to display its cross in close proximity to the Capitol Building? What kind of
"endorsement" does the CSRAB suggest is involved?
- What is the nature of the "exception to the
endorsement test", which Justice O'Connor believes Justice Scalia
(for the plurality) would "carve out"? Why does she object to
it? Does she correctly read his opinion?
- What about the option for the state of posting a
disclaimer on or near the KKK's cross, denying
any endorsement? Would that be problematic?
- GOOD
NEWS CLUB V. MILFORD
CENTRAL SCHOOL, p. 1768
(2001).
- How does this situation differ, if at all, from Lamb’s Chapel?
- Is there a greater risk of implicit school
endorsement of an activity directed to elementary school children, than
of one directed to adults?
- are
Milford’s rules substantially different from
those of Center Moriches Union, or were both acting on a generalized
prohibition against use for religious purposes?
- Suppose a church asks Milford for use of its building for
Sunday services and Sunday School. Can the
school properly refuse, assuming no prior commitments of the space?