Re-prioritizing Who is Made Whole in Tort Actions: the Injured Party or the State?

Gallardo leaves Missouri’s statutory and regulatory scheme in Medicaid reimbursement vulnerable and subject to change. While Missouri currently explicitly limits the recovery of Medicaid to past medical expenses, lawmakers with similar ideologies to the majority may read the Court’s ruling as a signal to propose new legislation in allowing the State to recover more losses than its due.

Continue reading

Capital Punishment for Inaction of Ineffective Post-Conviction Counsel: How Sixth Amendment Protections Could be a Matter of Life or Death

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that in all criminal prosecutions the accused enjoys a number of rights, including the right to have the assistance of counsel. The right to counsel is vital to protect other fundamental rights during the criminal justice process such as the fundamental right to a fair trial. In Shinn v. Ramirez, the United States Supreme Court evaluated whether federal courts could hold evidentiary hearings to develop the record because state post-conviction counsel was ineffective and failed to properly develop a record.

Continue reading

Mississippi’s Drinking Problem: How Interstate Negotiation Can Solve Groundwater Wars

With climate change sweeping the nation and droughts in the American West, groundwater wars will likely become more common.  Groundwater litigation has involved claims from tortious takings, to commerce clause violations, to equitable apportionment.  And, states have some choice on how to handle these groundwater wars: litigate or enter into an interstate water compact.

Continue reading

The Court Takes the Bite Out of the Exhaustion Requirement of the PLRA

The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) was enacted in 1996 primarily to reduce prisoner litigation.  The passage of the PLRA led to a decrease in the number of cases filed in federal court by prisoners.  However, there is also evidence that suggests that even meritorious claims are barred from federal court based on technicalities through a failure to comply with the PLRA.  While the initial intent of the PLRA was to prohibit the increasing flow of frivolous suits by prisoners at the time, the consequences have been dire for prisoners seeking redress for meritorious claims that fail to meet the PLRA’s high standard of exhaustion.

Continue reading