Showing Publications By: Carl H Esbeck
Church Autonomy, Textualism, and Originalism: SCOTUS’s Use of History to Give Definition to Church Autonomy Doctrine
108 MARQUETTE LAW REVIEW 705 (2025)
The Respect for Marriage Act: Living Together Despite Our Deepest Differences
2024 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 511 (2024).
The World War I Memorial Cross Case: U.S. Supreme Court Takes a New Approach with the Establishment Clause
63 JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE 109 (2021).
The Establishment Clause: Its Original Public Meaning and What We Can Learn From the Plain Text
22 FEDERALIST SOCIETY REVIEW 26 (2021).
An Extended Essay on Church Autonomy
22 FEDERALIST SOCIETY REVIEW 244 (2021).
With the Supreme Court Having Decided Espinoza v. Montana and Ordering the State to Fund Religious Schools: What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2020-17 (2020).
The Free Exercise Clause, Its Original Public Meaning, and the Reconsideration of Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper no.2020-21
The Free Exercise Clause, New Originalism, and Reconsideration of Employment Division v. Smith
STARTING POINTS (Kinder Institute, August 24, 2020).
After Espinoza: What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
21 FEDERAL SOCIETY REVIEW 186 (2020).
Stating a Claim Under the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses: What Trump v. Hawaii Can Teach Us
61 JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE 637 (2019).