Debacle: How the Supreme Court Has Mangled American Sentencing Law And How It Might Yet Be Mended
77 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 367 (2010)
Operating Efficiently Post-Bilski by Ordering Patent Doctrine Decision-Making
25 BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 1673 (2010).
Book Review: Reviewing Part III of Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law
61 ALABAMA LAW REVIEW 587 (2010)
An Empirical Study of the Role of the Written Description Requirement in Patent Examination
104 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1665 (2010)
Taxpayer Standing From Flast to Hein
80 SUPRA, THE ONLINE COMPANION TO THE MISSISSIPPI LAW JOURNAL 1 (2010)
Panel Discussion at “Signs of the Times: The First Amendment and Religious Symbolism
63 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW 67 (2010)
A Middle Ground on Insider Trading
32 no.4 REGULATION 44 (2009/2010)
A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance
55 ANTITRUST BULLETIN 167 (2010)
What Great Writers Can Teach Lawyers and Judges: Wisdom from Plato to Mark Twain to Stephen King (Part 1)
4 PRECEDENT No.4 16-20 (2010), reprinted in 74 TEXAS BAR JOURNAL 612 (July 2011) and 22 CONNECTICUT LAWYER 30 (2011/2012).